02-28-2015, 01:30 AM
Is that you, Sam?
I've never played Legends through Harlequin, though I did play it once when Edi Birsan ran it. I have to agree with you: the game does offer a "level of depth and complexity" not found in any board game or in most other turn-based games. I don't think I suggested otherwise. For me, though, simpler games like "Through the Ages" hit the sweet spot.
Are you still calling Legends a "play-by-mail" game? Don't tell that Rick guy...
-- Bob
I've never played Legends through Harlequin, though I did play it once when Edi Birsan ran it. I have to agree with you: the game does offer a "level of depth and complexity" not found in any board game or in most other turn-based games. I don't think I suggested otherwise. For me, though, simpler games like "Through the Ages" hit the sweet spot.
Are you still calling Legends a "play-by-mail" game? Don't tell that Rick guy...
-- Bob