I wasn't involved in anything big or a major battle. I was a small new race that only played for 13 turns and was just exploring the local vicinity. I can only supply what happened to me. It is still useful for showing the mundane normal character of the game. I did include multiple special action forms in my scans and they include the results for those actions. I did encounter an Absorton ship. There is a computerized battle report that I partially scanned (Dated Jan 4th 1984, very few items are dated). The computer green bar paper is hard for me to scan since they are much bigger than 8 1/2 x 11. I was tech 45 they were tech 533. I lost two destroyers but using a special order was able to approach, enter and take some tech from the globe ship in aprox. turn 7 according to the GM remark.
Do note that some of the questions I asked are answered and signed by the GM. I notice a Patty, a Tim, a Teri, and a Tate. I also have a question about fees charged where the answer was signed by Patty Schubel.
My StarMaster game (circa early 1984) was definitely run by Schubel and Sons. I still have an envelope that the turns came in. I have both the StarMaster and StarMaster II rule books, but the replies in game itself seems to all be labeled StarMaster. There are pencil notes, I made, as to point costs for race design in the StarMaster II manual so I know I had it at the time. Personally, I do not remember which I was playing other than I was thinking StarMaster which could apply to either.
The name on the scans is not mine. I had a partner and we shared expenses In the questions and special action action forms, you can see both sets of handwriting. However, I now have all the documentation.
P.S. The registration page in the original StarMaster rule book was removed but is intact in my copy of StarMaster II. The registration form sent to Schubel and Sons does not match the form in the back of StarMaster II booklet. From this, and the supporting documents that just say StarMaster, I conclude that I was playing StarMaster rather than StarMaster II.
Do note that some of the questions I asked are answered and signed by the GM. I notice a Patty, a Tim, a Teri, and a Tate. I also have a question about fees charged where the answer was signed by Patty Schubel.
My StarMaster game (circa early 1984) was definitely run by Schubel and Sons. I still have an envelope that the turns came in. I have both the StarMaster and StarMaster II rule books, but the replies in game itself seems to all be labeled StarMaster. There are pencil notes, I made, as to point costs for race design in the StarMaster II manual so I know I had it at the time. Personally, I do not remember which I was playing other than I was thinking StarMaster which could apply to either.
The name on the scans is not mine. I had a partner and we shared expenses In the questions and special action action forms, you can see both sets of handwriting. However, I now have all the documentation.
P.S. The registration page in the original StarMaster rule book was removed but is intact in my copy of StarMaster II. The registration form sent to Schubel and Sons does not match the form in the back of StarMaster II booklet. From this, and the supporting documents that just say StarMaster, I conclude that I was playing StarMaster rather than StarMaster II.