Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Back to the Future of PBM
#2
I agree that wikipedia is very useful. But like all encyclopedias it is angled to more relevance to the country it is produced in. Translations to other languages exist but are often not so detailed. Wikipedia is a public collective effort and so reflects the debates and issues of those most active. Its always useful to look at the talk page of each item, some are extremely long, others not. But it is a big job to revise and write new items on subjects that ignored or subsumed under other items.

But with all that in mind, it is still a useful resource, and worth using. Play-by-mail game has its own page but only three or four known pbm companies Flying Buffalo, Harlequin, Glory of Kings. Though having said that many new ones might be put up by other pbm companies. Madhouse, LOTR, and many others could do so if they read this! I hope they will...
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Back to the Future of PBM - by GrimFinger - 11-22-2011, 10:34 AM
RE: Back to the Future of PBM - by Greybeard - 11-22-2011, 04:10 PM
RE: Back to the Future of PBM - by GrimFinger - 11-22-2011, 11:28 PM
RE: Back to the Future of PBM - by Greybeard - 11-23-2011, 06:26 AM
RE: Back to the Future of PBM - by ixnay - 11-22-2011, 04:15 PM
RE: Back to the Future of PBM - by GrimFinger - 11-22-2011, 11:42 PM
RE: Back to the Future of PBM - by tstone - 01-17-2012, 09:49 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)